On Sat 14 Sep 2013 15:59, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > It looks like a useful tool to me.
FWIW I totally agree! > I don’t like the name “mvar” (“monadic variable”, I guess). Perhaps > “synchronized box”, or “transactional variable”, or...? The downside of > choosing another name is that people familiar with the concept won’t > recognize it first-hand. I guess I can see this. I prefer "box" to "variable" fwiw. How about "tbox"? (The T for threadsafe or transactional or something; perhaps this is a bad idea.) Dunno :) Andy -- http://wingolog.org/
