Panicz Maciej Godek <godek.mac...@gmail.com> skribis:
> I think it would be best to extend SRFI-26 with the option of using
> <1>, <2>, ... placeholders, where the resulting lambda would get the
> arity indicated by the highest placeholder. Also, it should support
> nested expressions.
> Personally, I'd prefer it over the Gauche-style extension.
I think I’d prefer this too, but actually I’m mostly satisfied with
SRFI-26.
One related thing I sometimes lack is:
(define-syntax-rule (thunk exp ...)
(lambda () exp ...))
(Found in Racket, notably.)
Ludo’.
