Arne Babenhauserheide <arne_...@web.de> writes: > What do you think?
I don't have a strong opinion at all, since this feels like a bikesheddy issue, but I think the current behavior is more preferable. A lambda form cannot have an empty body, and having a docstring shouldn't change that, so I would expect (lambda x "foo") to be either an error, or yield a constant function. The former would deviate from the standards and possibly make some code break (though it's a trivial fix), and is not an improvement in consistency either since docstrings aren't mandatory. Taylan
