On Tue 25 Mar 2014 18:01, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > Tu put it differently, I don’t think it would buy us anything to make > variable SRFI-111 boxes.
Dunno; variables are slightly cheaper than records. Their type checks are easier and they take less memory. > However, it could perhaps break code In what way? > and would not allow for a separate type printer, which is useful. Not sure what this point is, as the external representation was not specified in SRFI-111. Perhaps we are miscommunicating -- I would change what we currently call "variables" to be "boxes". WDYT? Andy -- http://wingolog.org/
