On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 11:15 AM, Nala Ginrut <nalagin...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Alright, I changed a system and try it again with evince successfully. > Anyway, I did't find any maths or special symbols in it, so it could be > published on your blog as plain text. But you may insist on the opinion of > PDF.
There is another reason why I use PDF. It's much nicer to read. I love Garamond. Did you see the Jobs movie? Do you remember what he said about Garamond? > It's not your mistake but mine. ;-) Well being mistaken about somebody else's mistake that wasn't a mistake is about the least mistaken it's possible to be: it really doesn't matter at all. What we really need to do is find out what software Mark was using to pdf->png. If it segfaults then there is a good chance that that bug can be turned into a working exploit. Because all binaries distributed by the binary-distributors are identical, attackers can analyse the file and work out how to turn a bad pointer dereference into an exploitable "PDF attack vector" which executes binary code contained in the PDF. Ian
