Hi Ludovic, Sadly, I nowadays only have time to look at guile-devel briefly now and then. I did this now and happened to see this.
Just wanted to say that I think that we (or at least I) at some point in time had the goal to replace structs with pure GOOPS data structures. In the context of FFI, this would allow you to be more flexible than what structs allow, ultimately being able to access arbitrary C structs and C++ structs/classes directly from Scheme. I find that a proper MOP (which maybe still is not fully developed) is a nicer way to handle non-standard access than the strange character strings in struct vtables... Happy hacking! Mikael On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 5:28 PM, Ludovic Courtès <l...@gnu.org> wrote: > Hello! > > I would like to have foreign object types based on structs rather than > GOOPS classes. > > The rationale is that GOOPS is normally not loaded unless the user > explicitly asks for it; having (system foreign-objects) load it would > add overhead even for users who just want SMOB-like functionality. > > WDYT? > > The preliminary patch attached is an attempt to do that. Somehow, the > creation of GOOPS classes for vtables doesn’t work as I thought, which > means that ‘test-foreign-object-scm’ cannot define methods and so on > (which I agree is useful functionality.) What am I missing? > > Thanks! > > Ludo’. > > PS: The reason I’m looking at it is that I would really want us to > release 2.0.12 ASAP, so any changes to this API must be settled. > >
