taylanbayi...@gmail.com (Taylan Ulrich "Bayırlı/Kammer") writes:
> Our and-let* wasn't entirely conformant to SRFI-2. It would return #t
> for a variety of forms where it should return the last evaluated
> expression's value instead.
Can you give some examples that demonstrate the problem?
> Here's a patch. Is the copyright a problem?
Yes, our policy is to assign copyright to the FSF.
Mark
