Hello, guile hackers!
I've been reading the guile manual (which I find very informative, by
the way; good job!) and spotted a couple of typesetting errors.
>From 2dd896b390afda506829ad735b5e7eb89316f7e1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vladislav Ivanishin <vladislav.ivanis...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 18:14:22 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] Fix a couple of typos in the docs
* doc/ref/scheme-ideas.texi: the some way -> the same way
* doc/ref/scheme-intro.texi: Use @math inside a texinfo command (turns out
$math$ is not processed in this context and thus is not rendered correctly).
---
doc/ref/scheme-ideas.texi | 2 +-
doc/ref/scheme-intro.texi | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/doc/ref/scheme-ideas.texi b/doc/ref/scheme-ideas.texi
index 15cf664..d18d101 100644
--- a/doc/ref/scheme-ideas.texi
+++ b/doc/ref/scheme-ideas.texi
@@ -484,7 +484,7 @@ moved to @ref{Curried Definitions}
(It could be argued that the alternative @code{define} forms are rather
confusing, especially for newcomers to the Scheme language, as they hide
both the role of @code{lambda} and the fact that procedures are values
-that are stored in variables in the some way as any other kind of value.
+that are stored in variables in the same way as any other kind of value.
On the other hand, they are very convenient, and they are also a good
example of another of Scheme's powerful features: the ability to specify
arbitrary syntactic transformations at run time, which can be applied to
diff --git a/doc/ref/scheme-intro.texi b/doc/ref/scheme-intro.texi
index 57aa18f..b8a5024 100644
--- a/doc/ref/scheme-intro.texi
+++ b/doc/ref/scheme-intro.texi
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
Guile's core language is Scheme, which is specified and described in the
series of reports known as @dfn{RnRS}. @dfn{RnRS} is shorthand for the
@iftex
-@dfn{Revised$^n$ Report on the Algorithmic Language Scheme}.
+@dfn{Revised@math{^n} Report on the Algorithmic Language Scheme}.
@end iftex
@ifnottex
@dfn{Revised^n Report on the Algorithmic Language Scheme}.
--
1.9.1
