Sounds reasonable to aim for 2.2.1 instead of 2.2. As for copyright assignment, that is assumed (it is a GNU package with copyright assigned to FSF, so assignment is required for anything more than 10 lines), though I have yet to sign a document assigning it. So I do need the stuff to sign to properly assign it. I was planning on needing to sign it (another reason getting it into 2.2 might not be tenable).
Freja Nordsiek On Mar 10, 2017 9:25 AM, "Andy Wingo" <wi...@pobox.com> wrote: > Hi! > > On Thu 09 Mar 2017 22:13, Freja Nordsiek <fnord...@gmail.com> writes: > > > I've written preliminary versionf of all the R7RS libraries along with > > documentation and unit tests for most of the procedures I had to add > > (none for those that were re-exports/renames of existing procedures in > > Guile). Sorry for the bad timing (right before the 2.2 release). > > Great work! > > For what it's worth, I think we probably don't have time to get this in > for 2.2.0. I think we should expect to go back and forth for a couple > weeks at least to get things right; so we can look forward to this being > a nice 2.2.1 feature. > > I think along with this work, we should add --r6rs and --r7rs > command-line options to make the initial environment when running a > script be R6RS or R7RS, respectively, rather than Guile's native > environment. > > Are you OK with assigning copyright to the FSF? If so I will send you > details privately. I understand that everything is online these days so > it's not so much of a wait. > > Cheers, > > Andy >
