Hello all,
I just realized that I made a mistake, and my mistake has caused people
to strongly condemn RMS for something that he did not actually do.
RMS has not yet appointed me as a co-maintainer. To my knowledge, the
only thing he has done so far is to *ask* me if I wanted to be appointed
co-maintainer. I answered "yes", but I've not yet received any further
messages from him on this topic. I also note that I'm not listed as a
maintainer in the official list of maintainers.
I misinterpreted RMS's question as an offer, and that was my mistake.
The fault is mine, and mine alone. RMS should not be blamed for it.
Mark
Andy Wingo <wi...@pobox.com> wrote:
> Still, it was with surprise that I woke up this morning to a request
> from Mark to re-join the Guile project on Savannah, saying that RMS had
> appointed Mark to become co-maintainer, and that Mark assented -- "given
> recent events".
>
> Now, Richard has no idea about Guile or how it works either technically
> or socially, and has not consulted with me as Guile maintainer, nor to
> my knowledge did he consult with Ludovic.
"Thompson, David" <dthomps...@worcester.edu> wrote:
> But now that I know that the truth is that RMS, as chief nuisance, put
> Mark back into this role without the consent of either active Guile
> co-maintainer, and without even telling them, I am extremely
> disappointed and I do not approve.
Christopher Lemmer Webber <cweb...@dustycloud.org> wrote:
> I'm extremely saddened to see RMS pull this move. It seriously
> undermines faith for maintainers of GNU projects that ther is any
> semblance of fair governance, and that the rug can't be pulled out from
> under their feet at any time.
