Linus Björnstam schreef op ma 20-12-2021 om 09:15 [+0100]: > I played around with it and it seems to rely heavily on mutation, > which makes guile (and chez and racket for that matter) box the > values. That adds a layer of indirection to memory access, meaning > slower code (apart from the more obvious problems of continuation > safety and threading safety).
Concerning thread-safety and continuation safety: as long as continuations aren't resumed multiple times (*), and as long as no closures are passed, then the mutation doesn't make any observable difference (except fastness). (*) E.g., the continuations that guile-fibers construct are resumed only once. Greetings, Maxime.
