lloda <ll...@sarc.name> skribis: >> On 11 Jan 2023, at 18:37, Thompson, David <dthomps...@worcester.edu> wrote: >> >> On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 12:34 PM Ludovic Courtès <l...@gnu.org> wrote: >>> >>> What could be convenient though is ‘bytevector-copy’ (no bang), which >>> would combine ‘make-bytevector’ + ‘bytevector-copy!’. >> >> 'bytevector-copy' already exists, or do you mean some different >> implementation of it? >> >> - Dave > > The current bytevector-copy takes a single argument.
Right, what I had in mind is one that would take an offset and size; I hadn’t realized the name was already taken. Thanks, Ludo’.
