Hi, Ludovic Courtès <l...@gnu.org> writes:
>> Why should Wisp be a separate package when other SRFIs are made part >> of Guile? Your point about maintenance and evolving applies equally >> to other SRFIs. > > That’s a good point. Making it available as (srfi srfi-119) would make > sense I guess. I need to take a closer look… That’s where the documentation and tests are located: - test-suite/tests/srfi-119.test - doc/ref/srfi-modules.texi::5666:@node SRFI-119 The language implementation is in (language wisp) because that’s in the language search path. Best wishes, Arne -- Unpolitisch sein heißt politisch sein, ohne es zu merken. draketo.de
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
