Hello, Colin Woodbury <co...@fosskers.ca> skribis:
> In that case, please hold on the patch. I am currently "rounding out" > the "one true Transducer API" in several other Lisps, and am close to > what I consider a representative set of the desirable primitives a > developer would want out-of-the-box. One I'm done there, I will return > to this and a few things that are currently missing. > > The other Lisps have also achieved a zip-like pattern (i.e. passing > multiple collections to `transduce` at the same time, thus allowing > functions like `map` to operate on multiple inputs). > > There is also the issue of SRFI-171's disambiguated `transduce-list`, > `transduce-vector`, etc., since Scheme has no `defgeneric` by > default. Guile _does_ however, so we could write a generic `transduce` > in Guile's own extensions. In general though it would be nice if > SRFI-XYZ "Transducers Redux" could depend on a standardized generics > system, but alas. > > Anyway, thanks for getting back to me. I'll return to this effort in > due time. Alright, ping me when you feel ready! Thanks, Ludo’.
