Le dimanche 07 juillet 2024 à 18:58 +0300, Eli Zaretskii a écrit : > Probably. Do you consider it a problem in Emacs or in Pango?
The Pango documentation explicitly states that Pango validates the input and "renders invalid UTF-8 with a placeholder glyph". https://docs.gtk.org/Pango/method.Layout.set_text.html Should it really emit a warning, in which case Emacs should do the replacement itself to avoid the warning? Or should it just render the text, with the placeholder glyph, without warning? I don't really know. > > [...] > Once again, I described what we do in Emacs in the hope that it will > help you find your own solution. If it doesn't help, that's fine by > me; there's no need to argue as long as what we do is understood. Thank you for your insight; I think it's valuable, even though I don't think this solution is the best for the particular tradeoffs of Guile (but I agree that the problem is significant and the tradeoffs are not easy). BTW, let me make it clear that I'm not a Guile maintainer, just a lurker like you.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
