Tomas Volf <[email protected]> writes: > I think allowing this would mask bugs, even the GnuCash fixed it with > "it revealed a couple of misplaced closing parens". I have no strong > opinion on special-casing the missing test body, should I send a patch?
Happy to defer to you as the resident SRFI-64 expert --- I'm currently inclined to think that a more specific error message might save people some time as compared to the current result. -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4
