[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ludovic Court�s) writes: > Actually, you meant something like: > > guile> (define x 2) > guile> (define 'x 3) > guile> x > 2 > guile> 'x > 3 > > Right? The example you gave doesn't produce anything funny unless `x' > was previously defined.
Hmm, no, I meant (define 'x (* x x)). I think '2 => 4 is pretty funny, no? :-) _______________________________________________ Guile-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user
