Kevin Ryde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Marius Vollmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> Could you try to fix this in 1.6 as well? > > I put it in, I think it works.
Thanks! > On the merely dodgy as opposed to broken front, I suspect the hash > function should be using logxor, and that perfect-funcq doesn't need > to work the base-func into the hash, since the hash is private the > each func. Hmm, I don't really understand what you are saying here, but if you feel strongly about changing it, go ahead! (In HEAD :). -- GPG: D5D4E405 - 2F9B BCCC 8527 692A 04E3 331E FAF8 226A D5D4 E405 _______________________________________________ Guile-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user
