"Mikael Djurfeldt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 5/7/06, Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I agree that this explains why the export is not necessary (and hence >> why it works without it). But I don't yet understand why adding the >> export messes things up. > > In the current module system, the effect of mentioning a variable in > an export statement is to set up a new, undefined, variable with that > name. This variable is added to the module and to the export list of > the model. The former has the effect of shadowing the old variable =.
I see. Thanks for explaining this. Neil _______________________________________________ Guile-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user
