Hi, "Marco Maggi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I would appreciate if someone can find 5 mins to read: > > <http://community.schemewiki.org/?guile-compensation> > > and signal to me if there are obvious errors in the > implementation. I haven't read the paper you mention there but that looks very similar to what `dynamic-wind' does. Given that `with-fluids' is implemented on top of `dynamic-wind', building a form akin to `dynamic-wind' on top of `with-fluids' seems a bit counter-productive. :-) Or did I miss something? Thanks, Ludovic. _______________________________________________ Guile-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user
