Hi,
Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> There are (at least) three possibly interesting requirements that this
> doesn't cover. Right now I'm still wondering about these, so ideas
> are welcome.
>
> 1. The Guile application is going to load a file that contains
> directly-executed code as well as procedure definitions, and you
> want to set a breakpoint (ahead of time) on some of the
> directly-executed code.
But this ("directly-executed" code) is bad style anyway. ;-)
> 2. You want to set a breakpoint somewhere in the middle of a complex
> procedure, not right at the beginning of it.
>
> 3. You're using Guile interactively (e.g. using the GDS interface in
> Emacs) and want to step through the evaluation of some code (which
> isn't a procedure definition).
>
> I think your question was aiming at (2) - is that right?
Exactly.
But wasn't `break-at' useful when, e.g., hitting `C-x SPC' in an Emacs
buffer (GDS)? Or probably it works differently because the code is not
loaded into the GDS "server" from the file you're editing in Emacs,
right?
Thanks,
Ludovic.
_______________________________________________
Guile-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user
