[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Hi,
>
> Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Thanks, I was lucky there. Do you think it's worth adding something
>> to CVS to try to make sure that we don't accidentally use func_data
>> again in future?
>>
>> What I have in mind is a new test in test-suite/standalone, which
>> would grep all Guile's C code for func_data, and cause "make check" to
>> fail if it found any.
>
> Yep, sounds nice and cheap enough.
OK.
> Besides, we could choose to systematically omit parameter names in
> function declarations, assuming headers aren't meant to serve as an API
> documentation.
Not API doc, no; but in practice I find that parameter names are
useful as coding doc.
> (Having little spare time these days, I'd appreciate if you could take
> care of it.)
Will do.
Neil
_______________________________________________
Guile-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user
