Ciao, "Ludovic Courtès" wrote: > >"Marco Maggi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> I have written a simple extension to test the >> compiled closures feature, and it seems to work. >> I wonder if it can be documented (and in this case >> I can contribute a Texinfo node) or there are plans >> to change the API. > >You're referring to `scm_makcclo ()' and the likes?
Yes. >The difference with `scm_closure ()', AIUI, is that a cclo's >environment is a simple C array instead of an alist. Mh. The "env" parameter is a simple alist? I will try to find what is the "code" one.... but I doubt that it is a gsubr. The compiled closure is the pair "scm_t_bits" array/gsubr. >However, I'm under the impression that code in `eval.c' >doesn't know how to deal with a cclo's environment >(e.g., there is no occurrence of `SCM_CCLO_BASE ()'). In Guile 1.8.3 at line 4139 of "eval.c", | case scm_tc7_cclo: | arg1 = proc; | proc = SCM_CCLO_SUBR (proc); which means that the compiled procedure is invoked with the closure itself as first argument. >So, what makes you think it works? :-) I tried it: $ tla register-archive http://arch.gna.org/gee/gee-2007 $ tla get <the-archive>/gee-examples--devel--0.4 :-) -- Marco Maggi "Now feel the funk blast!" Rage Against the Machine - "Calm like a bomb" _______________________________________________ Guile-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user
