On 06/11/2008, Andy Wingo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>  In short: arrrrgh! I've wanted this for years and I didn't know it
>  existed! I've had to put up with crap backtraces for a long time, just
>  because some intermediate code did a catch and rethrow, losing the
>  initial context and thus the backtrace -- argh.

It's good to know that it's useful, but I don't completely understand.
 lazy-catch also preserves the backtrace, and that's been there for
ages.

   Neil


Reply via email to