() [email protected] (Ludovic Courtès) () Wed, 06 Jan 2010 11:12:14 +0100 Hello!
Greetings! Excellent, and nice to see it’s 100% Scheme code! Well, as you can see, *which* 100% is still a question... I’m looking forward for the 1.9/2.0 port. :-) Me too. Currently ‘ttn-do’ fails to build for me with 1.9: ERROR: In procedure module-variable: ERROR: Wrong type argument in position 1 (expecting module): #f ERROR: In procedure module-variable: ERROR: Wrong type argument in position 1 (expecting module): #f Thanks for reporting this. I don't expect to address this problem specifically; perhaps it will sort itself out in the scheduled general revamping of ttn-do (you can monitor its NEWS for "tested with Guile 1.9"). BTW, what would you think of releasing the X11-related part of ‘ttn-do’ as a standalone library? I'd rather get all of ttn-do to be Guile 1.9 hostable, then do the split. I think that would be most expedient. On the other hand, the X11-related parts could do with some re-design -- both interface and internals -- and that might benefit from early separation. More modular requires more communication (between programmers, the code itself, and client code), which is a struggle for old frogs like me, but seems to be like water to you tadpoles. Hmmm, we'll see... Should read: http://www.gnuvola.org/software/rpx/ . Good catch; thanks. thi
