Hi, On Sun 05 Sep 2010 23:58, Thien-Thi Nguyen <[email protected]> writes:
> () Romel Sandoval <[email protected]> > () Fri, 03 Sep 2010 15:15:58 -0500 > > Do you think any of mentioned implementations should be > included with Guile 2.0 or it's better to keep it apart? > > Probably next week (2010-09-13 onward) i can find some time to add > (ice-9 base64) from Guile 1.4.x Cool! Perhaps we could combine interfaces -- the stream-based (I presume; I haven't seen your code yet, but I know your Scheme code looks good) interfaces from yours, and the map-3-to-4 stuff from Andreas' R6RS port of my base64.scm. I say this because the r6rs port already uses bytevectors, and compiles down to fairly tight VM code. I haven't run benchmarks though. Cheers, Andy -- http://wingolog.org/
