Hans Aberg <[email protected]> writes: > It seems natural to translate (f, g) x into ((f g) x), and () x into > (() x), but I'm not sure if the lists (f g) and () can be made acting > as functions this way.
(f g) would evaluate as a composition as long as f takes a procedure as an argument and returns a function that takes x as its argument. No problems there. Alternatively you could think of f returning a function of x when it evaluates g. Joel -- Joel J. Adamson Servedio Lab University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill FSF Member #8164 http://www.unc.edu/~adamsonj
pgpwXTiSVuFJn.pgp
Description: PGP signature
