"Andreas Rottmann" wrote: > Was this a clean build? IIRC it was right after a "git clone" and a run of autogen.sh.
>> Is it fine for me to follow the "master" branch to get >> the "latest thought to be usable"? > > ATM, most work is happening on stable-2.0, and master is > only updated sporadically. I am interested in the version which will have the first usable R6RS; I will follow stable-2.0 for now, thanks. -- Marco Maggi
