Hello troll! ;-) ri...@happyleptic.org skribis:
> I fail to see why Scheme is intrinsically safer than C Scheme is strongly, though dynamically typed. A string is a string, a number is a number, and they cannot change types anyhow. C is weakly, though statically typed. A pointer is a pointer, and it can point to anything, or be uninitialized. A pointer is also a number, and so it can be forged. Any object can be cast in almost any other object. And of course, this is not to mention the many other ways to shoot oneself in the foot–manual memory management being among the most prominent–nor the many missing features that prevent higher-level programming. My contribution to feeding the troll. :-) Ludo’.