I am running this $ guile -v guile (GNU Guile) 2.0.9-deb+1-1 Copyright (C) 2013 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
License LGPLv3+: GNU LGPL 3 or later <http://gnu.org/licenses/lgpl.html>. This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it. There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. $ on this $ uname -a Linux UlanBator 3.10-2-686-pae #1 SMP Debian 3.10.5-1 (2013-08-07) i686 GNU/Linux $ a Debian testing system updated weekly. I did this $ guile GNU Guile 2.0.9-deb+1-1 Copyright (C) 1995-2013 Free Software Foundation, Inc. Guile comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY; for details type `,show w'. This program is free software, and you are welcome to redistribute it under certain conditions; type `,show c' for details. Enter `,help' for help. scheme@(guile-user)> (define (naughty) (let ((i 1)) (naughty) i)) scheme@(guile-user)> (naughty) <unnamed port>:1:31: In procedure naughty: <unnamed port>:1:31: Throw to key `vm-error' with args `(vm-run "VM: Stack overflow" ())'. Entering a new prompt. Type `,bt' for a backtrace or `,q' to continue. scheme@(guile-user) [1]> ,q scheme@(guile-user)> (naughty) Aborted $ echo $? 134 $ I'm thinking the second call to naughty should give me another stack overflow, rather than aborting guile. On the other hand, maybe I didn't reset the system properly after the first stack overflow. Which is it? If it's the latter, what's the proper reset?
