2014年4月2日 PM7:54于 "Neil Jerram" <[email protected]>写道： > > [Now guile-user only, since that seems appropriate] > > > On 2014-04-02 11:08, Nala Ginrut wrote: >> >> On Wed, 2014-04-02 at 10:29 +0100, Neil Jerram wrote: >>> >>> Hi there, >>> >>> I'm interested in adding support for WebSockets >>> (http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6455) to Guile's web modules. Is anyone >>> else interested in - or possibly already working on - that? >>> >> >> I was planing to implement websocket in Artanis web-framework and >> there's half-baked code. Then I realized it's better to integrate with >> the server, but Artanis hasn't written its own server. So it's >> appreciated if anyone can do the job. ;-) > > > Wow, Artanis looks quite sophisticated and I'm wondering now if I should use it for my work instead of (web ...) directly. I need to take a closer look. >
I'm glad you like it! But oh, shame on me! So many people are interested in it but I haven't done a better database handling. Anyway, you can build a site if you can play sql directly. Although it works now, I haven't released it yet. Because I want to release the first version with better config and database module. The latest branch is wip-sql-mapping. There will be some changes compare to master. :-) > One immediate thing that I noticed: some of its API is different from (web ...) but not obviously better or at a different conceptual level. For example, your route context seems conceptually equivalent to (web request). Is this just because you first wrote Artanis before (web ...) was available? > Actually, route context is a Artanis specific local environment of each request. It's used to store info of features in Artanis, and passing necessary info in Artanis environment only, like url-remapping, sql-mapping, cookies inner processing...all the parts unrelated to http standard. The http requests are handled by (web ...), and it's just encapsulated in route context. So their function doesn't duplicate. > Regards, > Neil >
