John Cowan <[email protected]> writes: > On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 10:37 AM, Joshua Branson <[email protected]> wrote: > > Oh hey David! Thanks for the explanation! Maybe I need to take another > look at that book then. I found it a little repetitive, but I am > probably not quite grasping some of the fundamentals. > > It's meant to be repetitive. It's explicitly compared in the introduction to > Hanon's finger exercises for the piano: C-E-F-G-A-G-F-E, D-F-G-A-B-A-G-F, > E-G-A-B-C-B-A-D and so on forever, up > the scale and down in every key. Boring as hell, but just the thing to get > fluency into your fingers.
- lat? and atom? not in guile? Joshua Branson
- Re: lat? and atom? not in guile? Thompson, David
- Re: lat? and atom? not in guile? Joshua Branson
- Re: lat? and atom? not in guile? John Cowan
- Re: lat? and atom? not in guile? Thompson, David
- Re: lat? and atom? not in guile? Joshua Branson
- Scheme books [was: lat? and atom? ... Matt Wette
- Re: Scheme books [was: lat? an... Joshua Branson
- Re: Scheme books [was: lat... Matt Wette
- Re: lat? and atom? not in guile? Joshua Branson
- Re: lat? and atom? not in guile? John Cowan
- Re: lat? and atom? not in guile? Zelphir Kaltstahl
- Re: lat? and atom? not in guile? Shakthi Kannan
- Re: lat? and atom? not in guile? Joshua Branson
