What, none of the Great Ones know the answer to this? Surely I can't be the first to have anonymous functions in statprof'd code.
-- Christopher Howard p: +1 (907) 374-0257 w: https://librehacker.com social: https://gnusocial.club/librehacker gpg: ADDEAADE5D607C8D (keys.gnupg.net) On Fri, 2020-02-28 at 05:24 -0900, Christopher Howard wrote: > Hi, Guile's statprof utility is very helpful, but a lot of my output > lines point to anonymous procedures like "anon #x1db7d38". Is there a > way to figure out which specific lambdas those are referring to? In > principle it seems like I should be able to figure that out by > running > the dissembler (,x) on the code I am profiling with statprof, but the > addresses given by the dissassembler do not match the ones given by > statprof. >