On 2025-02-20 20:46, Arun Isaac wrote:
> Hi Nicolas,
>
> How about the following?
>
> (save-module-excursion
> (lambda ()
> (set-current-module (resolve-module '(guix scripts pull)))
> (your-code-here)))
Hi Arun, thanks for your answer, doesn't seem to help though.
This snippet displays %options of (guix scripts pull):
(eval
`(begin
(reload-module (current-module))
(display %options))
(resolve-module '(guix scripts pull) #:ensure #f))
This one doesn't:
(save-module-excursion
(lambda ()
(set-current-module (resolve-module '(guix scripts pull)))
(reload-module (current-module))
(display %options)))
But I guess at this point they almost have the same length/readability
already. Maybe I could create an eval-in-module macro that only takes a
module and a "thunk" to make that more readable and not having to check
the end of a big function to understand how undefined variables are set.
"thunk" here is not really one since it is quoted code for future
evaluation, rather than real code.
WDYT? Is there a better solution?
--
Best regards,
Nicolas Graves
