> In that case, would you suggest --list-generations=rec to specify the > recutils output format (with no filtering)?
No need for the ‘rec’ part. I propose to output all generations in the recutils format when ‘--list-generations’ is passed. > Age specifications would only be of the kind “at least X days/months > old”. A non-ambiguous syntax is needed, and something more flexible > than just ‘last-month’. Let’s assume ‘string->duration’: > "+22" ⇒ #<time time-duration ...> ; 22 days > "+2w" ⇒ #<time time-duration ...> ; 14 days > "+1m" ⇒ #<time time-duration ...> ; 30 days The plus sign is confusing (we’re subtracting). I’d rather use ‘22d’, ‘2w’, and ‘1m’. How can I subtract 22 days from (current-time) using SRFI-19? There is a ‘subtract-duration’ procedure, but I don’t understand how to create a ‘duration’ object. > These are just suggestions, but that seems to make more sense now. Indeed. > Apologies for the confusion! No worries. Thanks for the tips.
pgp6J1izKLAVQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
