Nikita Karetnikov <[email protected]> skribis: > I think we should change ‘--list-generations’ to not output the zeroth > generation. Even though it could be present in the profile, users > shouldn’t be concerned about it.
Agreed. > Currently, ‘--delete-generations’ ignores the zeroth generation. Other > options seem even more confusing: > > 1. If you don’t have any other generations and delete it, profile > couldn’t point to anything. > > 2. If you delete it along with the profile, users might be confused (or > angry). > > WDYT? I think it should be impossible to remove Generation 0 through the command-line tools, because that generation exists precisely so that the profile always points to something valid. So yes, ‘--delete-generations’ must ignore Generation 0. Ludo’.
