Pierre-Antoine Rault <p...@rigelk.eu> skribis: > On 10/03/2014 21:56, Ludovic Courtès wrote: >> I’ve applied a stripped-down version of the patch: I ended up >> removing “Packaging 101” because it was redundant with the >> “Packaging Guidelines” section of the manual, so I moved the >> missing bits in that section (info "(guix) Packaging Guidelines"). >> I also removed details about how ‘git format-patch’ and co. work, >> because these commands already have their own manual. > > I admit it was overkill :) > >> I realize the manual can be improved when it comes to introductory >> material. > > I would think of a (not so) short explaination of the guix tree as > seen in the GNUnet manuel, for instance. What do you think ?
Hmm, perhaps. Actually, part of the module name space is described here in there. For instance (gnu packages ...) is described under “Package Modules”, (guix build ...) is described under “Derivations”, etc. Perhaps a new section with cross-refs to these would help? Ludo’.