Andreas Enge <andr...@enge.fr> skribis: > On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 12:53:50PM +0400, Alex Kost wrote: >> All 3 packages have some custom licenses, so I used "bsd-style", but I'm >> not sure about it. Along with the patch, I'm attaching "COPYING". What >> license it is? > > Whenever I read "deal in the software without restriction", I think of x.org, > which I packaged. So this looks like the x11 license: > http://directory.fsf.org/wiki/License:X11 > > This license adds more sentences, from the second sentence of the second > paragraph on: "In addition publicly documented acknowledgment must be given > that this software has been used...". > > So I suppose you should use x11-style.
Agreed, with a comment explaining this. Otherwise LGTM! Ludo’.
