Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Ricardo Wurmus <ricardo.wur...@mdc-berlin.de> skribis:
>
>> I wrote the author an email to ask whether this can be fixed upstream
>> for other architectures than x86_64. Until then should I just declare
>> x86_64 as the only supported architecture?
>
> Probably yes, with a comment pointing to this discussion and possibly
> the one with the author(s).
This may not even be necessary; the developer replied with a hint and
attached is a patch that should fix the build on non-x86_64
architectures. It builds fine locally with
./pre-inst-env guix build --system=i686-linux hisat
Does this look okay?
~~ Ricardo
>From 5a73d260fcff839f5d07ef4ae684c78c4660f3d3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ricardo Wurmus <ricardo.wur...@mdc-berlin.de>
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 11:58:40 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: hisat: fix build on non-x86_64.
* gnu/packages/bioinformatics.scm (hisat): Add "POPCNT_CAPABILITY=0" to
make-flags on architectures other than x86_64.
---
gnu/packages/bioinformatics.scm | 11 +++++++++--
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/bioinformatics.scm b/gnu/packages/bioinformatics.scm
index 48bb9dd..f384cb8 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/bioinformatics.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/bioinformatics.scm
@@ -252,8 +252,15 @@ Illumina, Roche 454, and the SOLiD platform.")
"1k381ydranqxp09yf2y7w1d0chz5d59vb6jchi89hbb0prq19lk5"))))
(build-system gnu-build-system)
(arguments
- '(#:tests? #f ;no check target
- #:make-flags '("allall")
+ `(#:tests? #f ;no check target
+ #:make-flags '("allall"
+ ;; Disable unsupported `popcnt' instructions on
+ ;; architectures other than x86_64
+ ,@(if (string-prefix? "x86_64"
+ (or (%current-target-system)
+ (%current-system)))
+ '()
+ '("POPCNT_CAPABILITY=0")))
#:phases
(alist-replace
'unpack
--
2.1.0
