Andreas Enge <andr...@enge.fr> writes:
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 11:52:30PM +0200, Taylan Ulrich Bayırlı/Kammer wrote:
>> Right. I don't know what I did wrong before, but it actually seems to
>> work fine to put it in gl.scm. New patch:
>
> Okay, looks good.
>
> I just realise that libva-without-mesa is maybe a semantically better name.
Changed the name.
>> - ;; TODO: Solve circular dependency with libva.
>> - ;; ("libva" ,libva)
>> + ("libva" ,libva-no-mesa)
>
> Maybe add a comment: "to solve the circular dependency".
Added a more elaborate comment above the libva-without-mesa definition.
Thanks for the feedback!
Taylan
