Alex Kost (2015-04-29 12:31 +0300) wrote:
> Eric Bavier (2015-04-29 01:14 +0300) wrote:
>
>> On 2015-04-28 15:18, Alex Kost wrote:
>>> From dcc331e7ab3fd0687c5a4ef8f084bc0bf4ca1cef Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>>> From: Alex Kost <alez...@gmail.com>
>>> Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 22:21:37 +0300
>>> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add tvtime.
>>>
>>> * gnu/packages/tvtime.scm,
>>> gnu/packages/patches/tvtime-gcc41.patch,
>>> gnu/packages/patches/tvtime-pngoutput.patch,
>>> gnu/packages/patches/tvtime-videodev2.patch,
>>> gnu/packages/patches/tvtime-xmltv.patch: New files.
>>> * gnu-system.am (GNU_SYSTEM_MODULES): Add package.
>>> (dist_patch_DATA): Add patches.
>>
>> Perhaps we could name the file "tv.scm", in anticipation of other
>> TV-related code?
>
> Indeed, I think it would be better, thanks!
>
>>> + (inputs
>>> + `(("libx11" ,libx11)
>>> + ("libxt" ,libxt)
>>> + ("libxtst" ,libxtst)
>>> + ("libxinerama" ,libxinerama)
>>> + ("libxv" ,libxv)
>>> + ("libxxf86vm" ,libxxf86vm)
>>> + ("libpng" ,libpng)
>>> + ("libxml2" ,libxml2)
>>> + ("freetype" ,freetype)
>>> + ("zlib" ,zlib)))
>>
>> I think we were lately trying to stay away from aligning inputs like
>> this (ISTR Ludo requesting it not be done on some other patch reviews).
>> Not sure where the consensus is yet.
>
> OK, I'm going to remove the aligning.
>
>>> + (synopsis "High quality television application")
>>
>> How about "Television viewer"?
>
> I don't mind. Synopsis/description is always the hardest part for me :-)
>
>> Otherwise the rest look good to me.
>
> Thanks for reviewing.
I'm going to commit it (taking into account Eric's notes), If no one
objects.
--
Alex
