Alex Kost <alez...@gmail.com> writes: > Wouldn't it be better to name it "elpa-build-system" as that's what it > is in my opinion, since it does not retrieve the source directly from > upstream but from ELPA/MELPA/... "repositories" instead.
The build system doesn't assume anything about the source location. > > I imagine there may appear another build system for simple emacs > packages (that don't provide Makefile, etc.) that will compile elisp > files, generate autoloads and so on. I think it will be a system that > should be called "emacs-build-system". WDYT? That's what the proposed build system does. If it lacks some functionality that you think is desirable, I think it is better to add it here rather than adding another, almost identical, build system. Regards, Fede
