On Sat, Sep 05, 2015 at 04:33:52PM +0300, Alex Kost wrote: > I would also name it 'font-anonymous-pro', but I have problems with > naming font packages. Andreas (the author of those naming guidelines) > should know better.
Not really - I just formulated the consensus that had formed on the list. I would say that there is no obligation to include the name of the foundry (but it could give useful information in case more fonts from the same foundry are added, and would be needed if the same font name were used by different foundries). So I also think that font-anonymous-pro would be fine, or font-marksimonson-anonymous-pro, at your choice. Andreas
