On Sun, Oct 04, 2015 at 10:15:26AM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > LGTM. I think we should also rm -rf the code in a snippet.
Good point. > Besides, would our WebKit be picked up if we added it as an input? I do not think so, I did not see any configure option of the kind. Anyway, the real aim would be to get rid of qt-4 altogether; but we have a few packages that still require it and that have no new version that could be compiled with qt-5. > Please keep <http://bugs.gnu.org/21288> updated and mention it in the > commit log. Will do, although, as mentioned above, I would only consider progress on qt-5 as real progress. Andreas
