On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 10:59 AM, Ludovic Courtès <[email protected]> wrote:
> I guess we must still support -E for compatibility. Probably it should > do an implicit ‘sh -c’? This introduces implementation issues. What if a user provides both a -E command *and* a command after '--'? What's the sane thing to do? I also don't feel strongly that we need to keep flags around for compatibility this early in the game, given that we are alpha software and such. Thoughts? - Dave
