Alex Kost <[email protected]> skribis: > Ludovic Courtès (2015-10-11 19:52 +0300) wrote: > >> Alex Kost <[email protected]> skribis: >> >>> Ludovic Courtès (2015-10-09 15:40 +0300) wrote: >> >> [...] >> >>>> Can’t ‘sdl-union’ be used here? I think it was created specifically to >>>> solve this problem. (Currently it’s private to (gnu packages sdl) but >>>> you can export it.) >>> >>> Oh, great, I didn't know about it, thanks! It will reduce the workaround. >>> >>> However, just using this package cannot solve the problem: 'sdl-config' >>> points directly to "/gnu/store/…-sdl-1.2.15", so you need to modify a >>> package anyway to make it find "/gnu/store/…-sdl-union-1.2.15/include/SDL" >>> (that's why 'guile-sdl' specifies "--with-sdl-prefix="). >> >> Oh. :-/ Then I guess you can go with the original patch, which LGTM. > > Actually, I think it will be more clear to use 'sdl-union' here, because > the workaround is more concise, WDYT?
Indeed. > From 2ace868aa60b36eb134ac155f79cee6d2f402970 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Alex Kost <[email protected]> > Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2015 20:34:48 +0300 > Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add manaplus. > > * gnu/packages/games.scm (manaplus): New variable. OK! Ludo’.
