Ricardo Wurmus <ricardo.wur...@mdc-berlin.de> writes: > Alex Vong <alexvong1...@gmail.com> writes: > >> Regarding gc, I remember I accidentally ran "guix gc" and removed all >> the build dependencies like bash, glibc... Then, I realized the proper >> way to run gc is to run "guix gc -d <DIRECTORY>". Perhaps we should >> change the command for garbage collecting everything from "guix gc" to >> "guix gc -a" and "guix gc --all". Does this sound reasonable? > > I think this is not a bad idea. It would also make “guix gc” behave > more like the other sub-commands (i.e. require an argument). > > It’s not a command that’s used so often that the additional argument > would hurt much, in my opinion.
This makes sense to me too. -- Mathieu Lirzin
