Hi Eric, On 2015-10-22 at 05:25, quoth ericbav...@openmailbox.org: >> + (name "ghc-cpphs") > > We should probably name this package "cpphs".
Indeed. I've also renamed ghc-hlint to hlint. >> + (license lgpl2.1))) > > It looks to me as if the library portions are under the lgpl2.1+ (the '+' > because they specify no version), and the executable 'cpphs' is under the > gpl3+ (again, because no version is specified in the source), so both licenses > should be listed. Fixed.
