On 2015-10-22 at 10:47, quoth ericbav...@openmailbox.org: >> +(define-public ghc-hscolour >> + (package >> + (name "ghc-hscolour") > > I would suggest we name this package "hscolour" because it is primarily > program or tool.
Indeed, i have renamed it. > It also has libraries; perhaps those could be put in a "lib" > output? WDYT? Maybe i should be less lazy (surely we can forgive that in the context of Haskell), but to be perfectly frank, i'd just love to get these patches off my plate. Given that the Guix behaviour mirrors the Cabal behaviour for this package (that is, it's installed, or not) i think it's fine. But indeed i am not the most pedantic person here. I will defer to your better judgement, but for now i've only changed the package name. Thanks, p.
