Hey Andreas, On 2015-10-22 at 18:22, quoth Andreas Enge: > On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 05:43:03PM +0200, Paul van der Walt wrote: >> Right, i see what you mean. I agree that it'd probably be the right >> thing to do. However, to expedite the merge of wip-haskell-… i propose >> that i take the solution of ghc-x11 and apply it to the relevant >> packages, and then look at fixing the haskell-build-system. At that >> point we can simply remove the phases introduced to work around this >> deficiency. >> Do you think that's acceptable, or is it imperative* that we first solve >> the problem in the build system? >> I prefer the incremental approach (but i am not an objective outside >> observer). > > I think it sounds reasonable, and would save us from further iterations > of 150 commits sent to the mailing list :-)
I'm glad i'm not the only one who thinks that way :). I'll be happy to have these patches off my plate. > Seriously, I am impressed by your git juggling. Haha, thank you :-$, i still have much to learn though. I guess Guix is good practice for me? :) Kind regards, p.
